Voucher Not Eligible For Deletion Error

December 12, 2018, 6:30 am

≫ Next: Pass a variable from BSFN to BSFN

≪ Previous: Obtaining Millisecond Server Time

$

0

0

Hi,

So a voucher batch with 5 vouchers was created and posted. A check batch was then created off those vouchers. Before the check batch was posted, it was determined that one of the vouchers was incorrect and shouldn't be paid. And so the check for payment of that voucher was removed from the batch, and the check batch was then posted.

Now the goal is to remove the incorrect voucher. However, we ran into a Voucher Not Eligible For Deletion error, saying a voucher can't be deleted if it is paid or partially paid. We then went into the F0411 and changed the Pay Status from "P" to "A", thinking that would allow for deletion. It did not.

How do we go about removing, or voiding out, this voucher?

Thanks

---

Pass a variable from BSFN to BSFN

December 12, 2018, 10:06 am

≫ Next: FIND is not working in Portlet form

≪ Previous: Voucher Not Eligible For Deletion Error

$

0

0

Hello,

Have a dilemma, normally i could have simply done this with a DS field in the BSFN's, but the BSFN's are numerous layers deep from one another. I have seen pointers used for things similar but I haven't used them. Can someone give me some ideas of how to accomplish a seemingly easy task but very difficult to a novice.....


Thanks in advance...

FrankCLT

FIND is not working in Portlet form

December 12, 2018, 4:01 pm

≫ Next: Global items, UOM issues

≪ Previous: Pass a variable from BSFN to BSFN

$

0

0

I used a hidden 'FIND' to load my data into Edit Portlet form but the FIND is not working in stead of the loading records into grid line, program execute one of the Push Button to display Headless Detail form
I changed the program to display 'FIND' and allow user to load the grid line but 'FIND' did the same thing to call / display Headless Detail form

I am not sure if this is the Tool form issue.
Please let me know if you saw this before and know how to fix it.

E910 TR 9.1.5.9

Global items, UOM issues

December 13, 2018, 6:15 am

≫ Next: E1 Pages - Getting defaults into the Form Controls on entry

≪ Previous: FIND is not working in Portlet form

$

0

0

Dear,

We have the following issue:

Our items are globally used and so the UOM's for items has been standardized for KG. When working in Europe and Asia this is fine (Issue in KG on Work orders etc)...BUT in the USA we have issues:

People see the partlist components in KG, need to convert this into GA to have the right values. After physical issue the GA need to be converted back to KG again and manually they fill in the right KG to be issued.

Following options came to my mind to resolve this:
- Component UOM in GA.....this resolves the issue in USA, but creates an issue in Europe/Asia
- Dual UOM, although the functionality is not made for this, and we still need to fill in KG and GA
- Get rid of global items and have separate versions of the item between KG and GA countries.... not the way we prefer to go.

As this seems a common problem, I can imagine some of you had this topic before. Happy to hear solution directions

Serge

E1 Pages - Getting defaults into the Form Controls on entry

December 14, 2018, 5:36 am

≫ Next: Transportation Compartments were deleted

≪ Previous: Global items, UOM issues

$

0

0

Hi folks,

I've been asked to add an icon to a page which points to the Batch Version launch screen P98305W but to auto default 'R554111X' into the UBE field

I was thinking of the Parameterised URL feature and the FormDS, but the jas server changes each ENV, so I can't do that

I found this, just not sure how to use it
function runE1App(appId, formId, version, menuSysCode, taskName, formDSTmpl, formDSData);

Thanks

John

Transportation Compartments were deleted

December 15, 2018, 12:39 am

≫ Next: Looking for good overview document on Tools 9.2.3

≪ Previous: E1 Pages - Getting defaults into the Form Controls on entry

$

0

0

Dear List,
All Transportation compartments for bulk vehicles suddenly were deleted from F49301.
Has anyone come across the same event ?
ERP9.2

Thank you,
Cosmas

Looking for good overview document on Tools 9.2.3

December 17, 2018, 4:45 am

≫ Next: E1 Tax Explanation Code usage with AvaTax

≪ Previous: Transportation Compartments were deleted

$

0

0

I am looking for a good document that summarizes the features and benefits of the new Tools 9.2.3. I have read through the Oracle documents, but I am looking for a summary that I can present to my management and get them to sign off on it.

Thanks.

E1 Tax Explanation Code usage with AvaTax

December 17, 2018, 5:12 am

≫ Next: System print BIP output automatically

≪ Previous: Looking for good overview document on Tools 9.2.3

$

0

0

Hello!

We are in the process of implementing AvaTax in our E1 environment and there is a data configuration question that the vendor, Premier, has been unable to answer.

Is there a certain tax explanation code that should be used in conjunction with the Avatax tax/rate area code or would you continue to use whichever ones are currently set up on customer master records? We are currently using hard coded values of C or V (outside of E, which would no longer be used with the introduction of AvaTax & CertCapture).

Thank you so much!

---

System print BIP output automatically

December 17, 2018, 11:50 am

≫ Next: Revise PO GL date in new year

≪ Previous: E1 Tax Explanation Code usage with AvaTax

$

0

0

I have a BIP output delivery point to printer
Can BIP automatically print the output once the job complete or we need to select Printer to print?

E910, TR9.1.5.9

Revise PO GL date in new year

December 17, 2018, 6:06 pm

≫ Next: Orchestrator Studio all components are greyed out

≪ Previous: System print BIP output automatically

$

0

0

Hello group
Is there a way to warn/ error user if the try to revise/ receive PO in Jan 2019 and forget to put GL date for 2018 year? Just for year end?

Thanks

Orchestrator Studio all components are greyed out

December 18, 2018, 12:23 am

≫ Next: BSFN builds locally, but not during deployment build because of table columns

≪ Previous: Revise PO GL date in new year

$

0

0

Hi List,

I setup Orchestrator Studio 7.0 on Tools 9.2.3.1. When we login to Orchestrator Studio all components are greyed out and shows as access denied. We have done the following security setup

1: Setup a user id in Server manager AIS under allowed user through which I can login into the Orchestrator Studio
2: Enabled Feature security for ORCH, Rule, Service Request, Schedule
3: Setup View security for ORCH for *PUBLIC, * All
4: Setup Action security for ORCH *PUBLIC, * All
5: Restarted the AIS server and cleared JAS JDBC cache


The UDO Features such as Form Personalization, Form Extn which can be viewed from within JDE itself are visible and working fine. It looks like an issue when I login via Orchestrator Studio. Has anyone faced similar issue or has any clue what the issue could be


Regards,
Joel

Attached Images

• ORCH_Disabled.JPG (119.9 KB)

BSFN builds locally, but not during deployment build because of table columns

December 19, 2018, 5:23 am

≫ Next: Transform migration from Create Forms

≪ Previous: Orchestrator Studio all components are greyed out

$

0

0

Hello,

We received a package from a vendor with some updates in July. It included some BSFNs, files, etc. One of the files already existed, and I'm not sure if the BSFNs did or not. The file in question had an update to the columns, the BSFN in question is referencing these new columns. This was found because when the build attempted to happen we got this:

Quote:

---

\\VM-E1-DEPLOY01\E920\DV920\package\DV121818T\source\B5600 186.c(103) : error C2039: 'x1ccid' : is not a member of 'F56ADP25'


\\VM-E1-DEPLOY01\E920\DV920\package\DV121818T\include\f56a dp25.h(20) : see declaration of 'F56ADP25'

---

This error repeats for each missing column/reference in the BSFN. There's a few, "Few too arguments" but that I assumed was because it didn't recognize the columns it was trying to use. I pulled down the file and the header (.h) was different, the header had the correct columns, whereas the object from OMW showed the older columns. So I used the existing header file, tweaked the existing table, saved it, then generated it and the header file. Afterwards I checked out the BSFN, built it successfully and checked it back in. I thought this would fix it. Pushed it up, asked the CNC for a build. Same error. The table and the BSFN were in the same project, so we separated them, and promoted the table by itself. That build worked, but the BSFN project failed with the same error. I've had the CNC build the BSFN on their machine that the do deployments from, but not on the DEP machine, do I need to ask him to build it on the DEP machine? I thought that would just build locally, unless they checked it in.

Running out of ideas, with the exception of maybe deleting the BSFNs and the file from JDE, then using the vendor's .par files to start over, fixing the table prior to the first build attempt.

I'd really like to understand why this isn't working though. If the specs for the table are right in DV on both the web and the db server, the BSFN builds locally, the issue was the table columns and that's fixed.

Thanks,

Jonathan Theriot

E1 9.2 TR/AR

Transform migration from Create Forms

December 19, 2018, 7:23 am

≫ Next: Monthly Forecast in But Prefers to Have Weekly Out

≪ Previous: BSFN builds locally, but not during deployment build because of table columns

$

0

0

Hi All, We are in the process of upgrading JDE from 8.0 to 9.2. For forms (and other reports processing, like emailing simple PDF) we've bought Transform 7.0 designer. We have a huge learning curve as Transform is a completely different product than Create form Designer and Director we currently use (and the help files are not much help either). Main issue we are struggling with at the moment is sorting of R42565 - we have 2 details sections combined into 1 for form creation purpose and that one section can't be sorted as we want using document structure change. They recommended sorting the pdf before it hits the Transform server, which is a solution we can implement. However, my issue is that Transform should be the greatest form solution and what was (very easily) doable in old Create form designer, somewhat is a big deal/not possible in this package. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Monthly Forecast in But Prefers to Have Weekly Out

December 19, 2018, 8:53 pm

≫ Next: Gestion de la table F952440

≪ Previous: Transform migration from Create Forms

$

0

0

Dears,
The client runs the forecasting on 3rd party and comes with monthly data. And they plan to inbound the results into JDE but like to get the weekly output in JDE to drive the planning.
Does anyone apply the workaround for this before? I have been told World can perform the monthly in but weekly out, but obviously this is not the E1 standard function (neither can be done by R3465 nor R34650). Thanks!

Regards,
John, Apps 9.2 with TR 9.2.3

Gestion de la table F952440

December 20, 2018, 6:06 am

≫ Next: Inventory

≪ Previous: Monthly Forecast in But Prefers to Have Weekly Out

$

0

0

Bonjour à tous,

Je suis nouveau sur le forum et ne suis pas sûr de suivre le bon protocole, ni sût non plus d'être dans la bonne section pour poster.

Ma question de néophyte :

Par quel programme interactif JDE (hors SQL) peut-on gérer la table F952440 ? S'il n'existe pas de programme, par quel autre moyen peut-on mettre à jour cette table. Je veux juste passer un champ de 1 à 0 (WOFU7)

Navigateur données - F952440 [Grid Formats Detail]

Merci.

---

Inventory

December 20, 2018, 6:13 am

≫ Next: Migration from CF to Transform

≪ Previous: Gestion de la table F952440

$

0

0

Hello

Can anybody tell me how to upload List of Items in one shot into JDE from Excel ?

Migration from CF to Transform

December 20, 2018, 6:48 am

≫ Next: Batch Error

≪ Previous: Inventory

$

0

0

I posted this on Formscape forum, just reposting to CF one (maybe with better luck :)).
Hi All, We are in the process of upgrading JDE from 8.0 to 9.2. For forms (and other reports processing, like emailing simple PDF) we've bought Transform 7.0 designer. We have a huge learning curve as Transform is a completely different product than Create form Designer and Director we currently use (and the help files are not much help either). Main issue we are struggling with at the moment is sorting of R42565 - we have 2 details sections combined into 1 for form creation purpose and that one section can't be sorted as we want using document structure change. They recommended sorting the pdf before it hits the Transform server, which is a solution we can implement. However, my issue is that Transform should be the greatest form solution and what was (very easily) doable in old Create form designer, somewhat is a big deal/not possible in this package. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Batch Error

December 20, 2018, 7:31 am

≫ Next: Generating Pick Tickets for Item on Lot Hold

≪ Previous: Migration from CF to Transform

$

0

0

I have voided two payment batches and while posting I'm receiving the attached errors, which do not give a specific error, it says "record invalid"

No F0911 records exist in this Batch.
Error: Batch 528481 M In Error.
Error: Payment 00242325 16966 18112103 In Error.
Error: Record Invalid
One or more batches had errors.

Attached Images

• Batch Error.jpg (14.3 KB)
• Batch Error WC.jpg (26.3 KB)

Generating Pick Tickets for Item on Lot Hold

December 20, 2018, 7:56 am

≫ Next: Emailing simple PDFS using Transform

≪ Previous: Batch Error

$

0

0

We are placing items on lot hold to prevent them from being selected for picking / shipment. Here is our current process:
1) Enter sales order for manufactured part (line type = W)
2) Work order is processed and completed.
3) Item location / lot is place on lot hold (LOTS).
3) Work order has placed the item inventory into the location / lot on lot hold (LOTS).

I can see this hold in all the usual places (P41202, P4108, etc.). Availability is greyed out.

4) Run pick ticket print (R42520) for this order and item and lot / serial #.
5) Pick ticket is generated and looks normal. Order status codes are also updated.

We are using E1 9.2.0

There has been a processing option added to R42520 on the 'EDITS' tab. Processing option is"

Enter Allowed Lot Status Group to validate". This is to place the name of a Lot Group that allows processing of lots on hold (lot hold code is defined in the lot group (P41081) by document type).

My confusion is, why would this processing option be needed if the program already processes lots on hold?

Emailing simple PDFS using Transform

December 21, 2018, 8:50 am

≫ Next: UDO Projects cannot be viewed in P98220W

≪ Previous: Generating Pick Tickets for Item on Lot Hold

$

0

0

Hi All,
We have a need to email untouched .pdfs and .csv files from JDE 9.2. We use OSA parser for more advanced processing, but for many of our projects we don't need this complexity. If we direct UBE to an OSA output, we need to amend layout of the report as Transform does change it (BT wasn't able to tell us why), moving sections, removing variables etc. We don't want to spend time and effort to amend 70+projects.

So we need a simpler vehicle to receive a .PDF or .CSV and email it "as is", with no changes. Is the print Q the way to go? Does anyone have an example/sample project how this should look like. We are using Transform 7.0. Thanks! Anita