I'm trying to correct an RB batch that error-out with "Error: Intercompany out of Balance".
I processed 4 unapplied cash receipts using the G/L Receipt method. All 4 unapplied cash receipts are for the same client and was applied to the same g/l account. When I go to post, 1 of the entry error-out with : "Error: Intercompany out of Balance" (the bad entry). I do notice that if I go back into the cash application and review the General Ledger receipt information ...the 3 entries (the good ones) has all the required information still populated but the entry that had an error no longer has any information.
In the "Work with Receipt Detail" screen for the bad entry, it shows there was an entry (debit) made to my unapplied cash but there's no entry (credit) to the g/l account.
I ran the integrity reports and nothing shows up for this entry (is it because the batch isn't posted?). My coworkers didn't think it was due to AAIs because the other 3 didn't error out.
I tried reversing the batch, the 3 good ones was successful but not for the bad entry.
I then tried deleting the RB batch but it wouldn't let me because there are transactions in it.
Any ideas on how to approach and correct this problem?
I am creating an RTF template for our AP checks. Our check prints at the bottom of the first page only and if there is remittance overflow it will print continue to print on the next page/s. I need help with getting the check to print only on the first page. I am using subtemplates in the order listed below with the APCkSubTemp being the check portion that I need printed on the first page only. Please give any suggestions as I have been stumped by this one for a few days.
There are two methods to upgrade your release to 9.2. Traditional and Simplified Upgrade
Traditional Upgrade
>> Once 9.2 is released , the old method of upgrade is called as Traditional upgrade. This method can be used by any E1 Releases.
Simplified Upgrade
>> If your release is 9.0 update 2 or 9.1 or 9.1 update 2 then you can upgrade your release using simplified upgrade. In this upgrade the amount of retrofit effort is less.
Single Step Upgrade
>> Release XE , 8.0 , 8.12, 9.0 & 9.1 can be directly upgraded to 9.2
Two Step Upgrade
>> Release 8.9 , 8.10 , 8.11 & 8.11 SP1 can't be upgraded directly to 9.2. So first these releases have to be upgraded to 9.0 or 9.1 then it can be upgraded to 9.2
For more information watch this video : Click Here
In our distribution centers, a monthly work order is created for a prebuilt pack. The pack sometimes contains between 60-100 child items. However, we only build packs as needed. So, sometimes as few as one or two a day. Currently, we are manually receiving and issuing these items - a slow process. In some instances, we've moved to just doing an IA using an Excel template to copy/paste, but it doesn't create the commitment quantities we need to effectively manage our inventory.
We'd like to use the backflush program, but the inventory can't be issued from the lowest lot number or oldest expiration date. The child items are always pulled from the same JDE location (LINE, for example) and the parent is received to the same location.
Is there any way to set up the system so a backflush process for a specific order/order type can issue from a specific location?
Has anybody tried to use Xe on and IBM i running v7.2 or v7.3? Could you please direct me to a document from Oracle or IBM that states Xe is not supported on OS higher than IBM V7R1.
on the microsoft SQL server, I noticed a session ID is taking up an excessive amount of CPU time which is coming from the web server.
How can I tie that back to which user ?
any help is greatly appreciated.
we are on SQL2008R2, tools 9.1.5.7, E1 9.0 update1
I'm a JDE Developer and I would like to be Techno-Functional ( especially Financial module) . I have checked Oracle University training, and it seems very costly.
Anybody please suggest some alternative solutions.
I am using JDE v9.10 and would like to know if the system supports rounding of sales order quantity based on item's standard carton qty.
For example, Item A has standard carton qty of 10pcs. A customer requested for 6pcs of Item A. During SO Entry, can I configure the system to prompt a warning message to users to inform them the ordered qty is not in multiple(s) of standard carton qty?
The above should apply to the following scenario too:
Item B has standard carton qty of 5pcs. Customer requested for 8pcs.
If the above is feasible, kindly share how is this being configured.
We have a requirement to calculate the taxes on sample orders (FOC orders). Currently, the sample orders are handled through advanced pricing wherein the following adjustments are applied:
1. Base Price
2. Override Sample order price to 0 using advanced pricing
With the new requirement, we tried using accruals(with required accounts setup in 4270 & 4280) which calculates the VAT on the adjusted price for the customer and this value is stored in F4074.
1. Base Price 2. Apply accruals on adjusted price (stored in F4074)
3. Override Sample order price to 0.
However, during sales update F0911 entries are created only for COGS and Inventory and not for accruals. I understand revenue is 0 so it is not affected but how about the accrual. Does the accrual get recalculated on sales update? For non-zero price, accruals work fine. I was of the understanding that F4074 stores the accruals and that gets into GL during sales update. But looks like it is getting recalculated.
We just completed the Platform Pack install on a V7R3 iSeries Platform using the 9.2 Platform Pack installer. The installation from a windows workstation finished successfully and there were no errors reported in the installAction...log. All required Libraries and IFS directories have got created including the users,etc.
My problem is I cannot start the services on this install even after repeated attempt. The attempts to perform a STRNET causes the JDEE920 subsystem to start but thereafter there are no kernel jobs getting launched. I have checked the following things in order to troubleshoot and all looks ok...
- DSPRBDDIRE to make sure the entries match the host name.
- Checked the host entry records in CFGTCP
- Also verified that the NETWORK jobs is actually getting launched under JDENET job queue but when released it never starts the jdenet_k jobs. The subsystem starts but there are no jobs underneath.
- Checked the jde.ini entries to make sure the ports are not conflicting, also changed the JDE user password to match the new password.
I also noticed that there are no logs getting generated under /JDE920 folder on IFS, that is making the diagnosis even more difficult. I tried to check the Spool File for the NETWORK job but it shows the job ended with code 0 which is normal.
Is there something I am missing before starting the services for the 9.2 install. Important to mention that this is a fresh install and I am yet to run the Workbench but I believe that should not be problem to start the services atleast. I also noticed the security and the authority list is a little different than previous releases but the 9.2 Install/Upgrade guide does not mentions anything special I need to do to start the services. I have not yet configured the sitekey.
Any pointers will be very helpful and appreciated.
I am getting the 'Record Invalid' error when I do PO match, by putting G/L date 2018. If I change the G/L date to 2017, it works. Below is the error description.
Quote:
Record Invalid
A form level error has occurred. CAUSE: The record being processed either already exists for an 'ADD'
function or does not exist for an 'INQUIRY', 'CHANGE' or
'DELETE' function.
RESOLUTION: If you are attempting to inquire, change or delete a record you
previously added, there may be data base problems in your
production library. You should notify your data processing
department.
The error does not appear for some POs. I have been trying to solve it for the last two days, I have gone through all the possible ways I know, I have compared with the POs which does not have the error, but I could not find a solution. Please shed some lights.
>> Business Services that are made available to external sources need to be deployed to a Business Services Server. In other words, E1 functions are 'exposed to the outside world' via Business Services that are deployed to a Business Service Server.
>> Once the Business Service Server instance is created and configured properly, it can receive packages containing Business Services objects. These packages are built and deployed to the Business Services Server via a E1 Fat client.
>> A Business Service package will need to be deployed to the BSSV instance before the BSSV instance can be started.
Provider Scenario
External BSSV Services --> E1 BSSV Server --> E1 Enterprise Server ( BSFN ) --> E1 Database Server --> Retrieves Data from DB and share with 3rd Party
Consumer Scenario
From E1 --> E1 BSSV Server --> E1 Enterprise Server ( BSFN ) --> E1 Database Server --> Add/updates the Data of E1 DB from 3rd Patty BSSV Services
WAS 7.0.0.29
App release 8.12
TR 8.98.4.2
platform linux.
Single JAS server serving for E1 HTML and RTE.
Separate AppSrv02 profile created for RTE.
Separate HTTP server created for this:
following steps followed:
1.copied apachectl to apachectl_rte and edited
Added: HTTPD='/opt/IBM/HTTPServer/bin/httpd_rte -f /opt/IBM/HTTPServer/conf/httpd_rte.conf -d /opt/IBM/HTTPServer'
2.copied httpd.conf to httpd_rte.conf and edited accordingly to point webserver2
3.To start apachectl_rte, created the soft link for httpd_rte to point to httpd (/opt/IBM/HTTPServer/bin)
Logs attached from location :SystemOut.log
We just completed a migration from World to E1 9.2 and the following has occurred:
An employees Child Support has a stop date of 10/24/XXXX in World. The stop date is missing in E1. Its not taking payments, but he is showing up on the Child Support Deduction list which we do not want him to do. The Stop Date field isnt accessible to us to enter in E1. Can someone tell us how we can get that back in there.
I confirmed this in DV as well as PD
I have contacted the consultant we used but I am putting this here for comments.
We are prototyping some random directed put away and are struggling doing the instructions setup.
We are getting the below error and cannot seem to get past it.
not found in User Defined Code
An error has occurred in the grid on a hidden column (that is, a column that you cannot view). Please contact your system administrator. not found in User Defined Code 46 ZN
